said it would take a tougher stance against corporations that aren’t providing a full accounting of environmental risks, part of a slew of moves by the investment giant to show it is doing more to address investment challenges posed by climate change.
Among the moves, BlackRock said it would be increasingly disposed to vote against management and boards if companies don’t disclose climate change risks and plans in line with key industry standards.
BlackRock is also pulling back from thermal coal producers in actively managed debt-and-equity portfolios by mid-2020, a move that will lead to $500 million in sales. It will expand the range of sustainable investment products as well as double to 150 the number of exchange-traded funds that address environmental, social and governance challenges.
Share Your Thoughts
Should BlackRock be pushing companies to make changes based on the risks posed by climate change? Join the conversation below.
BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with about $7 trillion under management. It has risen on the back of index funds that trade on exchanges and through these funds has extended its reach across nearly every company and is part of the retirement accounts of millions of people around the world. The firm also sits at the backbone of Wall Street as its software is used by banks to monitor their risks.
The firm said it is putting the focus on sustainability because the costs of climate change have ramifications on the price of assets and the financial ecosystem.
“Climate change has become a defining factor in companies’ long-term prospects,” BlackRock Chief Executive
said in his annual letter. “The evidence on climate risk is compelling investors to reassess core assumptions about modern finance.”
The letter is a reflection of Mr. Fink’s towering influence over companies. But the letter has rankled some rivals who have sometimes grumbled about what they consider to be a moralistic tone.
The rise of index funds transformed three firms into major forces in corporate America and thrust them into the public spotlight. The biggest—BlackRock, Vanguard Group and
State Street Corp.
—hold roughly a fifth of the S&P 500 through funds they run for investors. They can cast critical votes and have the ears of chief executives. How they exercise this power—or choose not too—has ripple effects across markets.
All three have faced questions over their responsibilities as shareholders on behalf of investors in funds they run. In years past, these firms have targeted gender diversity in boardrooms among other issues.
Lately, there has been increased pressure on them to do more on climate change.
BlackRock’s offices around the world have been frequented by activists who blast the firm for being slow to act on green issues. The firm has debated a question internally: how can BlackRock ensure it has public support to operate in the countries where it does business as it continues to grow?
The firm said it would provide more information on data on the carbon footprint and other potentially controversial holdings in its mutual funds. It also said it would disclose more details of its conversations with the companies its funds invest in. BlackRock also recently said it had joined Climate Action 100+, the world’s largest group of investors by assets pressuring companies to act on climate change.
The moves come as regulators are scrutinizing funds with environmental and social aims, in an effort to determine whether the claims by various asset managers are at odds with reality.
It is a hot corner in the investment management world. Funds focused on sustainability attracted a spike in interest in the past year. U.S. open-ended funds and exchange-traded funds focused on those strategies took in over $20 billion in net flows in 2019, nearly four times more than in the previous year, according to
BlackRock has its eyes on a bigger presence in that market. That could help it win over younger investors and millennials who want to invest money in line with personal values.
The firm wants to increase assets it manages in so-called sustainable strategies to more than $1 trillion from $90 billion today.
“Over the next few years, one of the most important questions we will face is the scale and scope of government action on climate change, which will generally define the speed with which we move to a low-carbon economy,” Mr. Fink said in his letter.
He added that “while government must lead the way in this transition, companies and investors also have a meaningful role to play.”
Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8